Skip to main content

Week 3 UX Observation: An Observation on Wayfair's Wesbite.

Wayfair, an e-commerce company founded in 2002, launched its online store in 2008, offering everyday products such as pillows, rugs, and blankets. Despite its wide product range, the website's design is cluttered and disorganized.


Here's why that is the case with these five usability problem cases!  The Violation Severity Rating is located under each image.




The user interface of Wayfair has a limitation in terms of User Control and Freedom. This is because the website relies on a list instead of a dedicated page, which can be confusing for users. Wayfair only provides a link and an image, which makes it difficult for users to understand where to navigate. To get complete information about a product, users need to click on multiple links. For instance, an example is provided below.

Violation Severity Rating: 3.





The Consistency and Standards of Wayfair are low. Despite using a color palette that's easy on the eyes, how it's structured is problematic. For starters, on the main page, the text for products such as the ones highlighted in the image is small, and the Deals take up a big portion of the screen.
Violation Severity Rating: 4.






Wayfair's Visibility of System Status is not great. For example, while the info on this Pillow is there, the reviews for it are vague and the page doesn't give many images beyond just three photos.
                Violation Severity Rating: 3




Wayfair doesn't do a good job with Recognition rather than recall and that's because, with this screenshot, for example, you can tell what item is what, but some departments feel out of context such as the "Pet" and "Appliances."

Violation Severity Rating: 3




Wayfair's Flexibility and efficiency of use are poor. The excessive use of side menus rather than just traditional pages made for the sections makes doing anything on here more trouble than it's worth. An image is provided below.

Violation Severity Rating: 4



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Art Analysis: “Batman” by Lino Tagliapietra

Remember: Don't confuse this with the Dark Knight.   Created in 1998 by Lino Tagliapietra, this glass artwork takes heavy inspiration from Australian tools such as the Boomerang. The design of the glass artwork bears a striking resemblance to Batman’s Batarang weapon due to its shape, although the infamous DC comic book character of the same name has no relation to this glass. Batman uses a simple yet effective color palette of red and blue, in which the former color makes up a quarter of the paint used, while the latter is utilized in the middle of the glass. The glass texture on Batman features a wrinkle-like appearance, and the U shape of the glass conveys a sense of emotion. The design choices for  Batman  are clever and effective. Lino strategically uses only two colors, red and blue, which are usually associated with joy and freedom. As a result,  Batman  perfectly captures the feeling of positive energy. The design of  Batman  is very organi...

Week 5 UX: An Observation on Twitter/X

Twitter, a social media platform acting as a microblog, was created in 2006. In 2023, it was rebranded as X, with a stylized letter X replacing the bird as its logo. For this post, I'll call it Twitter.  Using 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, I'll explain what's wrong with this social media app. Twitter has inconsistent icons for actions, which will confuse users. An example is the share icon on both the web and mobile versions of Twitter. Violation Score: 3 Twitter is poor with User control and freedom due to its habit of constantly changing its layout every few years. Violation Score: 4 2006 2014 2023 Twitter's Flexibility and efficiency of use are poor. For example, there is no way a user can sync drafts or threads between web and mobile. Violation Score: 4 The mobile Twitter App Aesthetic and minimalist design is flawed due to the overall layout. An example would be the spaces feature, which takes a large portion of the viewing screen, causing clut...

Art Analysis: The Persistence of Memory!

This famous painting from 1931 is one of the most influential works of art ever produced. This surrealistic painting is notorious for its bizarre yet consistent aesthetic and color palette. The variety of colors and shading is what shapes its iconic environment. Its influence still applies to many abstract works of the modern era and is even referenced in shows such as The Simpsons. I always found the clocks in the painting symbolic in that they are a visual metaphor for how time flies fast and waits for no one. As for the ants on the watch, I think they represent the process of decaying after death, which makes sense as ants eat dead bodies in real life as well. The odd creature, the most famous portion of the painting, seems to be an exaggerated caricature of Salvador Dalí himself. In a way, this creature may represent how a person would live in a dreamscape.